FAC ⇒ RSA
Statement
Migrated verbatim from factoring § Known Results:
- The RSA assumption (hardness of computing -th roots mod ) is implied by the factoring assumption — RSA78; the converse is open (factoring may be harder than RSA)
Notes
class: unstated: no citing page says which notion of reduction is meant.
Recording a class the wiki does not state would add a claim.
Recorded during migration and not fixed — these are claims about the source text, not changes to it:
- SUSPECTED MATHEMATICAL ERROR: The RSA assumption is implied by the factoring assumption is backwards. Factoring N breaks RSA, so RSA hardness implies factoring hardness; RSA hardness is not known to follow from factoring hardness.
- The parenthetical (factoring may be harder than RSA) is the standard intuition and contradicts the main clause as written.
- Two claims in one bullet (the implication and the openness of the converse).
- RSA78 is cited for a relation it does not prove.