QIP = PSPACE
Statement
Migrated verbatim from quantum-interactive-proofs § Known relationships:
- — TODO citation (Jain, Ji, Upadhyay, Watrous 2010). Since as well, quantum interactive proofs are no more powerful than classical interactive proofs. This is a striking collapse: quantum communication between prover and verifier adds no power to multi-round interactive proofs.
Migrated verbatim from quantum-statistical-zero-knowledge § Known relationships:
- : quantum statistical zero-knowledge is contained in quantum interactive proofs, which equals PSPACE.
Notes
source: folklore: the claim carried no citation on the page it was
migrated from, and none was invented.
class: unstated: no citing page says which notion of reduction is meant.
Recording a class the wiki does not state would add a claim.
class: free because a containment between complexity classes is proved
by any argument at all; the reduction-class axis does not discriminate
here, and unstated would wrongly suggest the information is missing.
Recorded during migration and not fixed — these are claims about the source text, not changes to it:
- MISSING CITATION: ‘TODO citation (Jain, Ji, Upadhyay, Watrous 2010)’ with no reference page linked.
- TYPING LOSS: the equality reads as a one-way inclusion once split.
- TYPING LOSS (the defect this task targets): the parent’s ’=’ becomes a one-way sub-edge, so QIP = PSPACE would migrate as QIP subset PSPACE and the hard direction (PSPACE subset QIP is the easy one; QIP subset PSPACE is Jain-Ji-Upadhyay-Watrous) is silently dropped.
- Uncited here; the same equality is marked with a TODO citation at content/Complexity/quantum-interactive-proofs.md:22.