Subexponential LPN ⇒ OT

Subexponential LPN implies OT.

Statement

Migrated verbatim from learning-parity-with-noise § Known results:

Notes

class: unstated: no citing page says which notion of reduction is meant. Recording a class the wiki does not state would add a claim.

Recorded during migration and not fixed — these are claims about the source text, not changes to it:

  • Same hypothesis mismatch with YZ16’s constant-noise statement.
  • The OT security flavor (semi-honest vs malicious) is unstated, so the conclusion node is coarser than the theorem.
  • Two conclusions (CCA-PKE and OT) in one bullet — must be split.
  • HYPOTHESIS MISMATCH with the cited title: YZ16 is stated for constant-noise LPN (with sub-exponential hardness), while the bullet says subexponential LPN.
  • Display text CCA-PKE differs from the target page (public-key-encryption); the CCA security notion is not part of the identifier.
  • Missing space before the em dash (LPN— [[YZ16).