Subexponential LPN ⇒ OT
Subexponential LPN implies OT.
Statement
Migrated verbatim from learning-parity-with-noise § Known results:
Notes
class: unstated: no citing page says which notion of reduction is meant.
Recording a class the wiki does not state would add a claim.
Recorded during migration and not fixed — these are claims about the source text, not changes to it:
- Same hypothesis mismatch with YZ16’s constant-noise statement.
- The OT security flavor (semi-honest vs malicious) is unstated, so the conclusion node is coarser than the theorem.
- Two conclusions (CCA-PKE and OT) in one bullet — must be split.
- HYPOTHESIS MISMATCH with the cited title: YZ16 is stated for constant-noise LPN (with sub-exponential hardness), while the bullet says subexponential LPN.
- Display text CCA-PKE differs from the target page (public-key-encryption); the CCA security notion is not part of the identifier.
- Missing space before the em dash (LPN— [[YZ16).