ZKP ⇒ NIZK
Statement
Migrated verbatim from non-interactive-zero-knowledge § NIZK in the random oracle model:
Via the Fiat-Shamir heuristic, any sigma protocol can be compiled to a NIZK argument in the random oracle model by replacing the verifier’s random challenge with a hash of the prover’s commitment.
Migrated verbatim from non-interactive-zero-knowledge § Other results:
Migrated verbatim from zero-knowledge-proof § Other results:
Notes
class: unstated: no citing page says which notion of reduction is meant.
Recording a class the wiki does not state would add a claim.
This relation is stated on 3 pages; the statements above are all of them.
Citations disagree across pages: [object Object]
Recorded during migration and not fixed — these are claims about the source text, not changes to it:
- No citation on this line (FS86 appears only at line 64).
- Wikilink
[[zero-knowledge-proof|sigma protocol]]points ‘sigma protocol’ at the general ZK-proof page; sigma protocols are a strictly narrower object with no page of its own. - Fiat-Shamir requires a public-coin 3-move protocol with negligible-or-amplified soundness error; not stated.
- Bullet packs a positive result (FS86) and a negative result (GK03) together; must be split into two records.
- ‘sigma protocols’ is bare text here, wikilinked only at line 58.
- DISJUNCTIVE over models (CRS model OR random oracle model) with two citations for two different results — split into two records; this is the CRS/BFM88 branch.
- BFM88 does not ‘compile’ arbitrary ZK proofs: it constructs NIZK for NP in the CRS model under a specific assumption (quadratic residuosity / trapdoor permutations). The compiler framing is imprecise, and the assumption hypothesis is missing entirely from the hyperedge.
- The CRS model is not a wiki page (unlike random-oracle-model.md).